This is slightly different territory compared to my last few blogs because child arrangements cases hit differently to financial ones. Money is money, but children are your children, and there is nothing quite like sitting in a hearing about where your kids are going to live to make your hands shake and your heart race, however calm you usually are. 

 

I want to approach this one gently, because if you're here, there's a fair chance you're either already in this process or bracing yourself for it, and what you need right now isn't a lecture. It's a steady hand and some honest, practical thinking about how to get through it well. 

Before anything about court process or solicitors or paperwork: the single biggest factor in how well a child arrangements case goes is how much you manage to keep your own conduct focused on your child, rather than on your ex. I know how that sounds, and I know it's sometimes genuinely unfair to hear, especially if you feel like you're the reasonable one dealing with someone who isn't. But judges in this jurisdiction are looking for exactly one thing above all else: which parent can demonstrate, consistently, that they're thinking about the child's needs rather than scoring points. That's not a moral lecture, it's simply what tends to determine outcomes so it's worth knowing early, before old hurt starts shaping how you write emails or what you say in a hearing. 

Yes, plenty of people do, and do it well. The process, while emotionally heavy, isn't necessarily more legally complex than financial proceedings and in many respects it is actually less legally complex (not to say it is easy, just less wrapped up in jargon and procedure than financial cases). What it asks of you is less about legal argument and more about being clear, child-focused, and consistent in how you present your situation. If you're someone who can stay organised and keep your head when things get tense on paper, self-representation is a realistic option here. 

Thankfully, it's no longer a binary choice between "do it all myself" and "hire a solicitor for everything." There's a useful middle ground worth knowing about. 

 

Going entirely alone works well when things are relatively straightforward - both parents broadly want the same kind of arrangement and you're really just formalising it (although note, you won't usually need a court order for that, as if you're in agreement and there is no dispute you don't actually need an order at all), or the disagreement is narrow rather than fundamental. 

 

You'll need to get comfortable with the relevant forms (C100 if you're applying, and understanding what a Cafcass safeguarding check involves), but it's entirely learnable. 

 

Direct access to a barrister used to be one of the better-kept secrets of this process. It means you can instruct a barrister directly for specific pieces of work such drafting a position statement, representing you at a particular hearing or advising on a tricky point without paying for a solicitor to manage the whole case in the background. It's a brilliant option if you're broadly capable of handling the process yourself but want proper legal firepower at the moments that count most. Be aware though, it can SOUND like it'll be cheaper, but many direct access barristers will charge more to be instructed by a member of the public than they would by a solicitors, because, understandably, they are going to need to more work as direct access than they would if a solicitor was likely to be handling the day to day. 

 

Going "all in" with a solicitor makes sense when things are genuinely high conflict, when there are safeguarding concerns, when your ex has legal representation and the power balance feels uneven to the point you don't feel you can stand your ground, or when you simply know that the emotional weight of this is too much to carry while also managing a legal process. There's no badge of honour for doing this entirely alone if it's not the right call for your situation - knowing when to bring in full support is its own kind of strength, not a failure. 

Keep a simple, factual record of arrangements, handovers, and anything relevant such as dates, times, what was agreed, what happened. Not as ammunition, but because memory gets unreliable under stress and courts like clarity, not drama. 

 

If you're heading toward mediation (and for many cases, you'll need to attend a MIAM before you can apply to court anyway), go into it genuinely open to compromise rather than treating it as a box-ticking exercise before the "real fight." Plenty of arrangements get sorted there, with far less cost and far less damage than a contested hearing. 

 

And please, resist the very human urge to involve your child in the adult conflict, even subtly, even unintentionally, even when you're hurting. Courts notice this more than people expect, and more importantly, your child notices it too. 

Whichever route you take whether you are going it alone fully alone, using a direct access barrister or solicitor-led - you don't have to figure all of this out from scratch by yourself. If you want a steady starting point, ongoing support and a place to ask questions as things come up, the DWL membership and community is there for exactly that kind of practical support through a process that can otherwise feel very lonely. 

 

Be kind to yourself through this one. It's a different kind of hard to the financial side, and it deserves a gentler hand, including from you, towards you. 

For more help with divorce proceedings without lawyers, visit our Facebook group and take control of your case today.